EdenteV2, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 002A76

Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial

Identifieur interne : 002A76 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002A75; suivant : 002A77

Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial

Auteurs : A. G. Türk [Turquie] ; M. Ulusoy [Turquie] ; S. Toksavul [Turquie] ; P. Güneri [Turquie] ; H. Koca [Turquie]

Source :

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2013-06.

RBID : ISTEX:5DDC26DB0FDB9F7BC6E28ED6EBD0F28F9AB39FD1

English descriptors

Abstract

Marginal bone level is a criterion for implant success. The aetiological factors of bone loss have not been clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of implant systems and prosthetic materials on the marginal bone loss. Twenty‐three patients participated; two implant systems and three superstructure materials were used in this study. Twenty‐two of the implants were restored with porcelain fused to base metal alloy (BMA), 25 with porcelain fused to noble metal alloy (NMA) and 20 with zirconium oxide‐based ceramics. Radiographs were taken at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after loading. Crestal bone‐level changes were assessed with digital subtraction radiographs. The effects of superstructure materials and implants were evaluated with one‐way anova and independent samples t‐test, respectively (α = 0·05). The mean crestal bone loss was found 0·483 mm in 3 months, 0·622 mm in 6 months and 0·816 mm in 12 months. Prosthetic materials were found to have greater effect (β = 0·575, P = 0·015) on crestal bone loss than implant systems (P > 0·05). The porcelain fused to BMA restorations showed higher crestal bone loss than NMA‐based restorations (P = 0·003) at 3 months, (P = 0·038), at 6 months and (P = 0·00) at 12 months; however, crestal bone loss differences between NMA and zirconia were not significant (P = 0·629) at 3 months, (P = 0·974) at 6 months and (P = 1) at 12 months. Within the limitations of this study, our results revealed that rather than the implant systems, prosthetic materials seemed to have an effective role on crestal bone.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/5DDC26DB0FDB9F7BC6E28ED6EBD0F28F9AB39FD1/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/joor.12054

Affiliations:

Turquie

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002E06
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002E06
to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000629
to stream Main, to step Merge: 002A88
to stream Main, to step Curation: 002A76

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turk, A G" sort="Turk, A G" uniqKey="Turk A" first="A. G." last="Türk">A. G. Türk</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ulusoy, M" sort="Ulusoy, M" uniqKey="Ulusoy M" first="M." last="Ulusoy">M. Ulusoy</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Toksavul, S" sort="Toksavul, S" uniqKey="Toksavul S" first="S." last="Toksavul">S. Toksavul</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Guneri, P" sort="Guneri, P" uniqKey="Guneri P" first="P." last="Güneri">P. Güneri</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Koca, H" sort="Koca, H" uniqKey="Koca H" first="H." last="Koca">H. Koca</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5DDC26DB0FDB9F7BC6E28ED6EBD0F28F9AB39FD1</idno>
<date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/joor.12054</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5DDC26DB0FDB9F7BC6E28ED6EBD0F28F9AB39FD1/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002E06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">002E06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002E06</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000629</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000629</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2013:Turk A:marginal:bone:loss</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002A88</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002A76</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002A76</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Turk, A G" sort="Turk, A G" uniqKey="Turk A" first="A. G." last="Türk">A. G. Türk</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, İzmir</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>İzmir</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation></affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ulusoy, M" sort="Ulusoy, M" uniqKey="Ulusoy M" first="M." last="Ulusoy">M. Ulusoy</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, İzmir</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>İzmir</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Toksavul, S" sort="Toksavul, S" uniqKey="Toksavul S" first="S." last="Toksavul">S. Toksavul</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, İzmir</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>İzmir</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Guneri, P" sort="Guneri, P" uniqKey="Guneri P" first="P." last="Güneri">P. Güneri</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, İzmir</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>İzmir</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Koca, H" sort="Koca, H" uniqKey="Koca H" first="H." last="Koca">H. Koca</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, İzmir</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>İzmir</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">40</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="457">457</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="463">463</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">7</biblScope>
<date type="published" when="2013-06">2013-06</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Aetiological factors</term>
<term>Base metal alloy</term>
<term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Crestal</term>
<term>Crestal bone loss</term>
<term>Crestal bone loss differences</term>
<term>Crestal changes</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentsply</term>
<term>Dentsply implants</term>
<term>Different implant designs</term>
<term>Different prosthetic materials</term>
<term>Digital subtraction method</term>
<term>Digital subtraction radiography method</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant design</term>
<term>Implant length</term>
<term>Implant success</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Implant systems</term>
<term>Independent samples</term>
<term>Intraoral radiographs</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss measurements</term>
<term>Marginal bone resorption</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Month radiographs</term>
<term>Nite element analysis</term>
<term>Noble metal alloy</term>
<term>Null hypothesis</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated prostheses</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Porcelain</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic materials</term>
<term>Prosthetic superstructure materials</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic evaluation</term>
<term>Regression analysis</term>
<term>Restorative materials</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Superstructure</term>
<term>Superstructure material</term>
<term>Superstructure materials</term>
<term>Surgical technique</term>
<term>University school</term>
<term>Vander sloten</term>
<term>Xive</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Aetiological factors</term>
<term>Base metal alloy</term>
<term>Bone level</term>
<term>Bone loss</term>
<term>Clinical study</term>
<term>Crestal</term>
<term>Crestal bone loss</term>
<term>Crestal bone loss differences</term>
<term>Crestal changes</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dentsply</term>
<term>Dentsply implants</term>
<term>Different implant designs</term>
<term>Different prosthetic materials</term>
<term>Digital subtraction method</term>
<term>Digital subtraction radiography method</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant design</term>
<term>Implant length</term>
<term>Implant success</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Implant systems</term>
<term>Independent samples</term>
<term>Intraoral radiographs</term>
<term>John wiley sons</term>
<term>Marginal bone level</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss</term>
<term>Marginal bone loss measurements</term>
<term>Marginal bone resorption</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Month radiographs</term>
<term>Nite element analysis</term>
<term>Noble metal alloy</term>
<term>Null hypothesis</term>
<term>Occlusal</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Oral rehabil</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated prostheses</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Porcelain</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic materials</term>
<term>Prosthetic superstructure materials</term>
<term>Radiograph</term>
<term>Radiographic</term>
<term>Radiographic evaluation</term>
<term>Regression analysis</term>
<term>Restorative materials</term>
<term>Statistical analysis</term>
<term>Superstructure</term>
<term>Superstructure material</term>
<term>Superstructure materials</term>
<term>Surgical technique</term>
<term>University school</term>
<term>Vander sloten</term>
<term>Xive</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Marginal bone level is a criterion for implant success. The aetiological factors of bone loss have not been clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of implant systems and prosthetic materials on the marginal bone loss. Twenty‐three patients participated; two implant systems and three superstructure materials were used in this study. Twenty‐two of the implants were restored with porcelain fused to base metal alloy (BMA), 25 with porcelain fused to noble metal alloy (NMA) and 20 with zirconium oxide‐based ceramics. Radiographs were taken at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after loading. Crestal bone‐level changes were assessed with digital subtraction radiographs. The effects of superstructure materials and implants were evaluated with one‐way anova and independent samples t‐test, respectively (α = 0·05). The mean crestal bone loss was found 0·483 mm in 3 months, 0·622 mm in 6 months and 0·816 mm in 12 months. Prosthetic materials were found to have greater effect (β = 0·575, P = 0·015) on crestal bone loss than implant systems (P > 0·05). The porcelain fused to BMA restorations showed higher crestal bone loss than NMA‐based restorations (P = 0·003) at 3 months, (P = 0·038), at 6 months and (P = 0·00) at 12 months; however, crestal bone loss differences between NMA and zirconia were not significant (P = 0·629) at 3 months, (P = 0·974) at 6 months and (P = 1) at 12 months. Within the limitations of this study, our results revealed that rather than the implant systems, prosthetic materials seemed to have an effective role on crestal bone.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Turk, A G" sort="Turk, A G" uniqKey="Turk A" first="A. G." last="Türk">A. G. Türk</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Guneri, P" sort="Guneri, P" uniqKey="Guneri P" first="P." last="Güneri">P. Güneri</name>
<name sortKey="Koca, H" sort="Koca, H" uniqKey="Koca H" first="H." last="Koca">H. Koca</name>
<name sortKey="Toksavul, S" sort="Toksavul, S" uniqKey="Toksavul S" first="S." last="Toksavul">S. Toksavul</name>
<name sortKey="Ulusoy, M" sort="Ulusoy, M" uniqKey="Ulusoy M" first="M." last="Ulusoy">M. Ulusoy</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002A76 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002A76 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:5DDC26DB0FDB9F7BC6E28ED6EBD0F28F9AB39FD1
   |texte=   Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial

Marginal bone loss of two implant systems with three different superstructure materials: a randomised clinical trial

Source :

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri